Being a scenery builder, I look at all aspects of how the terrain interacts with the game. It has to be functional, playable, but above all, presentable.
I have seen tables that are little more than styrofoam blocks painted gray and called a city. I have also seen some really beautiful pieces, almost realistic, but do not offer LOS blocking or adequate cover for a small squad of troops.
But the real disappointment I have seen recently is the lack of original terrain. I believe home made terrain is the best as long as its quality matches that of the miniatures. I also believe that its OK to purchase ready made terrain if you can't make your own and its affordable.
Unfortunately, GW does not believe this anymore.
Remember these? Both of these books are my tomes to building scenery (along with some websites).
But, if you visit the GW website, they are no longer listed for sale. "Why is that?", you ask. Consider the book cost (at the time) $25.00. The materials are easy to obtain and can build you a great looking board. I have built a couple of 4'X8' boards for customers that I sold for $150.00. And believe me, my profit margin was very large.
A typical, hand-made board will look something like this:
Thanks to http://chicagoterrainfactory.wordpress.com/ |
Or you can go the GW route:
Great for 40K. |
I realize that some people are not good at building terrain, do not have the time, or the room for their own terrain. And thats all right. But I think its a horrible idea to steer people to just using kits for their terrain instead of giving them the option to make their own.
So what are your thoughts? Kit terrain or scratchbuilt? Whatever the option, make sure its something you're proud of and makes the game enjoyable.
I mentioned that direction of GW too! And I do not like it! But I think a mixture of what GW brings out and the creativity of a modeler can bring very great tables! 100% agree! But 100$ for a complete table as a commission is much to cheap! :-)
ReplyDelete